Comparison of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. in the...

Throughout the Civil Rights Movement, many leaders emerged that captured the attention of the American public. During this period, the leaders used different tactics in order to achieve change. Of two of the better-known leaders, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr., the latter had a more positive influence in the progress of the movement. Each of these two leaders had different views on how to go about gaining freedom. While King believed a peaceful means would allow the blacks to achieve equality with the white Americans, Malcolm X took a more pessimistic approach. He believed achieving equality was nearly impossible and preached a more separatist doctrine. Each mans beliefs were formed in their youth. King was raised in a†¦show more content†¦King was an excellent speaker and preacher at the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery, Alabama and rose in the ranks at the beginning of the movement during the Montgomery Bus-boycott. His teachings encouraged more peaceful mo vements such as sit-ins; the freedom rides and the famous Selma-Montgomery march for voting rights. Some of this call for peaceful change can be seen in the quote by King when receiving his Nobel Peace Prize, Nonviolence is the answer to the crucial political and moral questions of our time; the need for mankind to overcome oppression and violence without resorting to oppression and violence. Mankind must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love. Martin Luther King Jr., December 11, 1964 Even though his call for unarmed resistance, many of the movements actions were often met with force and resistance from white southerners. Often the participants in the movement were threatened, harassed, and thrown into jail. These actions taken by the whites were only met with still peaceful means and King discouraged retaliation. A classic example of this is when his home was bombed in Montgomery and he stood on his front stoop to encourage the neighborhood who wanted to take up arms, saying thatShow MoreRelatedComparison on Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr.: Who Had More Influence over the Civil Rights Movement1233 Words   |  5 PagesThroughout the Civil Rights Movement, many leaders emerged that captured the attention of the American public. During this period, the leaders used different tactics in order to achieve change. Of two of the better-known leaders, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr., the latter had a more positive influence in the progress of the movement. Each of these two leaders had different views on how to go about gaining freedom. While King believed a peaceful means would allow the blacks to achieve equalityRead MoreMartin Luther King Vs Malcolm X1436 Words   |  6 PagesSelene Sandoval Professor Solheim History 108 CRN # 20244 16 October 2016 Martin Luther King VS Malcolm X Ronald Regan once said: â€Å"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.† In fact, American history has had a great deal of leaders that brought change by improving the lives of others. These leaders introduced new ideas, models, and theories toRead MoreMartin Luther King And Malcolm X Essay882 Words   |  4 PagesMartin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were two freedom fighters who shared the same goal, which was freedom, justice and equality, but differed in their methods. Martin Luther King, Jr. meeting Malcolm X in the U.S. Capitol, 1964., 2017 Radical reform made sense to King while rejection and revolutionary rage made more sense to to Malcolm X (Waldschmidt-Nelson and Waldschmidt-Nelson, 2012). Dr. King was a Baptist minister who believed in the equality of all people beforeRead MoreGuts, Glory, Greatness: Inspiring Stories1280 Words   |  5 Pagesfrom the civil rights era including Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and Maya Angelou. Although Haskins is like some great contributors during the Civil Rights Movement time that doesn’t mean that he is like all great persons because the Texas Western basketball coach is not like Malcolm X because he does not chose to use violence even when provoked unlike Malcolm X who has no problem with violence being used to achieve a common goal. Although many people may believe that Martin Luther King Jr.’s non-violentRead MoreThe Preacher and the Fighter1200 Words   |  5 Pagesdid not have well-funded facilities in comparison to the white people. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, two different human activists with different personalities and thoughts, were the key factors in the Civil Rights Movement. Martin Luther King Jr. fought for the equality and freedom of the African-American by advocating nonviolence and trusting your enemies. Malcolm X also fought against racial injustice in the United States however, unlike King, X promoted self-defense. Both of these menRead MoreThe Civil Rights Movement Essay1634 Words   |  7 Pageswere a human being owned by another and as slaves they were deprived of most of their rights as an American and were treated as a peace of property. Many more African-Americans were brought to America to supply the demand of force labor needed in the south to produce agriculture. Slav ery of the African-Americans wasn’t abolished until the end of the Civil War which ended on April 26, 1865. The battles for equal rights weren’t over yet due to Jim Crow Laws established between 1877 and the 1950s. The JimRead MoreEssay about Malcolm X vs Martin Luther King Jr1804 Words   |  8 Pageshistorical change, progress, and thought I chose to focus on their respective views of race and race relations, in particular the Civil Rights Movement. I chose to write on the two diametrically opposed civil rights activists Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. In the 1960’s the African American community became increasingly active in the struggle for civil rights. Although the concept race is an arbitrary societal construct based on the color of an individual’s skin and his or her geographicRead MoreRhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Jr s Letter From Birmingham Jail1831 Words   |  8 PagesPersuasive writing is most effective when all three rhetorical appeals, Logos, Pathos, and Ethos, come together to form an indisputable argument. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X are two of the most influential figures of the past few decades; similarly, their work is summarized as some of the most persuasive and controversial of all time. The audience of both of their pieces, â€Å"Letter from Birmingham Jail† and â€Å"The Ballot or the Bullet† include oppressed African Americans and the white oppressorsRead MoreThe Civil Right Movement : History1705 Words   |  7 Pages The Civil Right Movement History can be absurd and sometimes can illustrate great accomplishment by great people. Why history is so important and significant to today’s society? It is something that people require to know about the pass and not remaking those same type of mistake again. Hence, history helps the world to understand changes and how the past causes the present to be the way it is in today’s society. Though the United States became a country with a rich foundation and great accomplishmentRead MoreComparing the Beliefs of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X Essay1782 Words   |  8 PagesComparing the Beliefs of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X By April 1968, two of the worlds most remembered civil rights leaders, who fought for a difference in black America, had been assassinated. Despite their different beliefs and their different ways of promoting this message, they both had the same goal in mind; to promote black respect and pride. The visionary and angry voices of Martin Luther King Jr., and Malcolm X together transformed theological thinking in

Diverse Workforce - 657 Words

1. What changes are occurring in our workforce today and are likely to continue into the future? Workforce diversity is increasing. There are more women, minority men and immigrants entering the workforce. 2. What is meant by affirmative action, and how does it tie in with EEO legislation? Affirmative action is an in-company program designed to remedy current and future inequities in employment of minorities. EEO legislation was designed to protect minority groups of any definition from discrimination. 3. In seeking to ensure conformance to EEO laws, what evidence of discrimination does the EEOC look for? In which areas of management is this most likely to occur? They look for differential treatment, disparate effect†¦show more content†¦Why? I would say allowing him to take the keys home as that shows you put a lot of trust and faith in him. 7. The men in Jane’s work group repeatedly- but jokingly and admiringly- address her as â€Å"Pam,† an obvious reference to her physical resemblance to Pamela Anderson. Jane doesn’t particularly like this and complains to her supervisor. What should the supervisor do? This is a sexual harassment claim. The supervisor must follow the company’s policies. An investigation must be conducted and in the end it must be made clear the company’s standards for this type of behavior. 8. If 19-year-old Pete is dissatisfied with his job and blames his unrest on the meaninglessness of his work, what is the possibility of this charge being justified? What might Pete’s supervisor do about this situation? This is a definite possibility. Younger employees tend to need to know why a job must be done a certain way, why it must be done at all, and how it relates to what is going on around them. 9. Why might an employee who works at a computer keyboard object to the number of her keystrokes being counted electronically as a measure of her performance? Do you believe that her employer has a right to make these measurements? I do believe they have a right to monitor keystrokes. The employee may object because she might not beShow MoreRelatedA Diverse Workforce947 Words   |  4 PagesThe problem iNOVA does not have a diverse workforce. Of the 103 employees, 78 of the employees are male. 89 of the 103 are white. (INOVA REPORT) There are a number of reasons why this could have happened. In smaller companies like iNOVA, many new employees are friends or associates of current employees who have been recommended. (Miller) People often associate with those similar to themselves, so those who they recommend will be like themselves, creating a homogenous environment. Likewise, it hasRead MoreDiverse Workforce1184 Words   |  5 PagesA Diverse workforce Outline 1. Introduction of a diverse workforce 2. Advantages of a diverse workforce nowadays 2.1 different skill and experience 2.2 broader service range 3. Problem of a diverse workforce these days 3.1 hinder sharing the formation of enterprise culture 3.2 reduce the enterprise culture execution 4. Solution of deal with the problem 5. Conclusion 6. Reference 1. Introduction In 1964, the Congress of the United StatesRead MoreManaging A Diverse Workforce1716 Words   |  7 Pagesâ€Å"Managing a Diverse Workforce.† Although there is an improvement in the diversity in the workforce, there is still room for change. Businesses have made many changes to help enforce the laws that were passed regarding diversity in the workforce. Women have been integrated into the workforce and there also have been many immigrants from other countries that have been given a new start to the workforce in the United States. Laws of equal opportunity have been made to help increase the workforce diversityRead MoreEssay Diverse Workforce1538 Words   |  7 Pagesï » ¿ Contents Part 1: Introduction†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦1 Part 2: Advantages of a diverse workforce............................................................................1 2.1 More creative†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦...............................2 2.2 Increasing sales and earnings†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..............................2 Part 3: Two problems of workforce diversity†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦3 3.1 Communication†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦............................3 3.2 Discrimination†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Read MoreBenefits Of A Diverse Workforce2135 Words   |  9 Pagesthe organization and its competitive advantage depend on upon its ability to increase the number of diverse employees, and to realize the benefits of it. Furthermore, the diverse workforce has become an increasingly important part of the American workforce. People with different backgrounds, knowledge, experience, and skills will bring new ideas which will benefit the entire team. A diverse workforce brings with it a lot of different benefits, as well as the potential disadvantages for corporate managersRead MoreManaging diverse workforce1842 Words   |  8 Pagesï » ¿ Modern Management MGT500- 2012 Managing Diverse Workforce Workforce diversity includes the obvious differences we see when we look around: race, gender, national origin, sexual orientation, age, religion and ethnicity. But it’s also the less obvious traits, the subtle differences that often register with us unconsciously, such as socioeconomic status, marital status, educational background, language, accent and appearance. We all have something that makes us unique, some specialRead MoreBenefits Of A Diverse Workforce1003 Words   |  5 PagesBenefits of A Diverse Workforce When the subject, cultural diversity is introduced as a topic, thoughts will vary. Some will associate cultural diversity with race. While others will think religion. The truth is, cultural diversity covers many areas. These areas range from sexual orientation to gender. The United States Department of Labor (DOL) website states by fostering a culture of diversity-or a capacity to appreciate and value individual differences-employers benefit from varied perspectivesRead MoreThe Diversity Of A Diverse Workforce2007 Words   |  9 Pages1. Diversity management is extremely important and must be an ongoing process within all levels of an organization. Diverse work groups often have better and more ideas because of their wide-ranging backgrounds and experiences. Also, companies with a diverse work force that operate globally may perform better. While working in a group people need to have a common way of communicating and accomplishing task. If the group members do not get along then the group is likely going to suffer. DiversityRead MoreSuccessful Management of a Diverse Workforce1641 Words   |  7 PagesIndividual Research Paper Successful Management of a Diverse Workforce By Harun Williams  © 2010 Harun Williams April 29th 2010 Introduction to Research for College Writing Comm112 Joe Tarin Abstract Managing a diverse workforce can prove to be a challenging situation. Many people do not enter the workforce with the intent to manage people, yet alone run another person’s business and the different personalities that work there. Most management positions areRead MoreManaging A Diverse Workforce Assists1858 Words   |  8 PagesManaging a diverse workforce assists in creating a vivacious and assorted business team with opportunities and challenges for people of all aptitudes and experiences, besides host country nationals. In addition, by managing a diverse workforce assists in the facilitation of change in a country’s normal operating business practices. According to Hofstede’s dimensions of culture model, one could better understand the challenges faced by multinational managers in regards to human resource management

Business Law Case Study of Travis and Linda †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Business Law Case Study of Travis and Linda. Answer: Issue According to the case study the issue has been found that Federal police has make allegations against Wendy, Travis and Linda that whether they have committed any offences under the Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Act 2017? Rules Linda, Travis and Wendy have found to take several initial steps against the meat industry where animals have suffered cruelty. The Commonwealth government has formed the Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Bill in recently 2017 for the dealing with threat of terrorism where they added some specific legislation. The government has mention about the society of Australia where sometimes they faced several threats and the mankind living under the fear of terrorism. This bill helps for the application against violence, terrorism activities and the terrorist groups with strong legal legislations where those have involved with the violent activities towards the citizenship of Australia. It has been introduced to the legal legislations where several penalties for the protection of Australian citizens from the effect of balance which are attacking continuously towards them. The Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Bill 2017 has been formed for the prevention of such violence towards the Austral ian government and citizens. The application of this will protect the Australian people from every harm, injury or and death by the terrorist and also prevent the extremist violence towards the citizens[1]. The Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Act 2017 has found several special legislation for the protection of the Australian society under section 3 of this act has been legislates the commission of a terrorist act which defines that when any person who have found to be a member of a prohibited group or related to be a member of under any prohibited group and the involvement with any terrorism act has found then the court will charges of violence offences against that person. Therefore if that person found guilty with such terrorism acts then under this section he will be punished. The section 3 has made the punishment of 10 years of imprisonment for the guilty of the offence of any violence activities or involvement with terrorism acts which make threats towards the Australian citizens[2]. The Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Act 2017 as legislated under the section 4 the supply of terrorist group. According to this section if any person has found to supply of any weapons or dangerous goods to any member of a terrorist group who are related with violence activities then he will be charged of guilty of supply of terrorist group. This section has described the threats the Australian people for the violence activities which may cause injury harm or death to them. Under this act the person who found guilty with this offence then he will be fined with penalties of $10,000 or imprisonment up to 1 year[3]. The section 5 of Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Act 2017 has been legislative in the section 5 the act of promoting terrorist activities. In this section it has been stated that if any person has found to form, join and distribute any information on behalf of promos the activities of any group of terrorist then it will define as an offence under this act. In this at the person has no right of any terrorist activities where he must not distribute any information which is related with violence activities and makes it violence towards the Australian citizens. The person must not involve in any terrorist activities and they will not promote any other person to enter in such terrorist activities. They must not distribute any information which explain many violence activities or any harm towards the Australian citizens. Under the Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Act 2017 if any person has found guilty of offence in promoting the terrorist activities then according to the section 5 of this at he will be punished with the penalties of up to 18 months of imprisonment. Application According to the case study the fact is Wendy and Travis has both decided to become a vegan when they watched a gruesome documentary about the meat industry where the animals has been treated cruelly and they become emotional about them. Therefore they have felt very strongly that it is very wrong for people to eat meat and animal products. They have decided to make some initial steps to stop the cruelty of animals. Regularly they have lookout the front of a local abattoir for their evidences. When that truck which carries animal for the local editor which runs meet and animal product business and they collect the recording about the noises by the animals. Then they have decided to protest about this cruelty. Travis has sent some messages to all of his friends on Facebook about the protest against the animal cruelty. However Linda the only person who replied to his message about to protest against the animal cruelty and then three of them has organized to meet the next day for discus sing about the plant action against the issues[4]. After that three of them make some initial steps to stop the animal cruelty in that local abattoir. They have used some bolt cutters for cutting a whole into the wire fence and used an oxyacetylene welder to burn the lock of the front door to set up camera which will watch inside the meat industry what they do with the animals. They also live streaming the whole video through a channel which showed an extreme instance of guilty towards the animals where those are using for the meat and animal products. The whole incident make the media outrageous criminal charges have been arises again the owners of that local abattoir. The federal police have gone through the whole situation and decided to charges against Wendy under section 3 and 5, Travis has been charged with section 5 and Linda has been charged under section 4 and 5 according to the Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Act[5]. The commonwealth government has forms the Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Act for providing the safety to the Australian citizens from any valence activities, harm or injuries or death which has been occur by the terrorist. The Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Act 2017 has found several special legislation for the protection of the Australian society under section 3 of this act has been legislates the commission of a terrorist act which defines that when any person who is found of a member of a prohibited group or related to be a member of under any prohibited group and the involvement with any terrorism act has found then the court will charges of violence offences against that person. Therefore if that person found guilty with such terrorism acts then under this section he will be punished. The section 3 has made the punishment of 10 years of imprisonment for the guilty of the offence of any violence activities or involvement with terrorism acts which make threats towards the Australian citizens[6]. The Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Act 2017 as legislated under the section 4 the supply of terrorist group. According to this section if any person has found to supply of any weapons or dangerous goods to any member of a terrorist group who are related with violence activities then he will be charged of guilty of supply of terrorist group. This section has described the threats the Australian people for the violence activities which may cause injury harm or death to them. Under this act the person who found guilty with this offence then he will be fined with penalties of $10,000 or imprisonment up to 1 year. The section 5 of Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Act 2017 has been legislative in the section 5 the act of promoting terrorist activities. In this section it has been stated that if any person has found to form, join and distribute any information on behalf of promos the activities of any group of terrorist then it will define as an offence under this act. In this at the person has no right of any terrorist activities where he must not distribute any information which is related with violence activities and makes it violence towards the Australian citizens. The person must not involve in any terrorist activities and they will not promote any other person to enter in such terrorist activities. They must not distribute any information which explain many violence activities or any harm towards the Australian citizens. Under the Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Act 2017 if any person has found guilty of offence in promoting the terrorist activities then according to the section 5 of this at he will be punished with the penalties of up to 18 months of imprisonment[7]. According to the case study The federal police have gone through the whole situation and decided to charges against Wendy under section 3 and 5, Travis has been charged with section 5 and Linda has been charged under section 4 and 5 according to the Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Act. Wendy has found to be carried the whole plan of protest against the animal cruelty where they have went abattoir of the meat industry and animal products. Under section 3 of Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Act she has been charged with commission of a terrorist act. The federal police also added charges against her under the section 5 of Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Act which defines promote terrorist activities. She has been found to distribute information and promotes the activities to the social media which define the violent activities which is also referred as an offence. Travis who has been also charged with the offence of promotes terrorist activities under section 5 of Prohibited Groups (Anti-Terrorism) Act 2017. The federal police have made the charges against him as because he has found to forms, joins, distribute information and promotes violence activities which can be threatened against the Australian citizens. According to the act if any person has found involving in the promoting of terrorist activities then he will be found guilty of offence under the section 5 and charges with several penalty. This is also found Travis was involved about the protest plan against the animal quality where the animals been using in the meat and animal products. At the time of live streaming video in the local abattoir he also involved in the activities. The terrorist activated group must not involve in the distribution of information or create any violence terrorism activities under section 5 of prohibited groups anti-terrorism act 2017. According to this at the person who will found in the involvement of such activities then he will be ordered for the punishment of up to 18 months of imprisonment[8]. Linda is also involved in the plan of protesting against the animal cruelty where animals are using in the meat and animal products. She has been charged with section 4 and 5 under the prohibited groups anti-terrorism act 2017 which describes the supply a terrorist group and promote terrorist activities. Under the section 4 it has stated that is any person who has found supplies weapons or dangerous goods to any member of terrorist group will be guilty of offence under this act. At the time of the application of the plan Linda has been found to supply bolt cutters and the welder and give them to Wendy at that night. According to the sections it also found at the time of live streaming video which has been made for the protest against the animal cruelties in the meat and animal products. Conclusion However Wendy, Travis and Linda have felt very strongly that it is morally wrong for people to eat meat and animal products and due to such emotional they have decided to take initial steps against such cruelty. However according to the facts of the case that they have no intention to create any harm or injury or death to any person but the activities they have done has been occur due to the morality and the act of good faith which can we help them to reduce their penalties for the charge defense is against them[9]. References Ananian-Welsh, Rebecca, and George Williams. "The new terrorists: The normalisation and spread of anti-terror laws in Australia." Melb. UL Rev. 38 (2014): 362. Awan, Imran, and Brian Blakemore, eds. Extremism, Counter-terrorism and Policing. Routledge, 2016. Beckman, James. Comparative legal approaches to homeland security and anti-terrorism. Routledge, 2016. Hosen, Nadirsyah. "Law, religion and security." Routledge Handbook ofLaw and Religion (2015): 337. Lynch, Andrew, Nicola McGarrity, and George Williams. Inside Australia's anti-terrorism laws and trials. NewSouth, 2015. Sarre, Rick. "Metadata Retention as a Means of Combatting Terrorism and Organised Crime: A Perspective from Australia." Asian Journal of Criminology 12.3 (2017): 167-179. Saul, Ben. "Minorities and Counter-Terrorism Law." (2017). Williams, George. "Anti-terrorism laws and human rights." Rev. Const. Stud. 19 (2014): 127.